A) Which are the oldest living organisms on our planet?
1. Here
are the seven oldest trees in the world*:
-
The Senator. Age: estimated to be 3,500 years.
-
Gran Abuelo. Age: 3,646 years.
-
Sarv-e Abarkuh. Age: estimated to be between
4,000- 5,000 years old.
-
Llangernyw Yew. Age: estimated to be between
4,000 – 5,000 years.
-
Methuselah. Age: 4,849 years.
-
Prometheus. Age: 4,862 years.
-
Unnamed Great Basin Bristlecone Pine. Age: 5,067
years.
2. The
same article says:
Although humanity is destroying the planet quicker
than Mother Nature can recover, fortunately there are still natural wonders in
this world that have survived for thousands of years. All of the trees on this
list are/were at least 3,500 years old- unfortunately a few of these ancient
giants were destroyed by human hands. The rest of the surviving trees on this
list are protected to prevent their destruction and one of the oldest even has
a secret location not disclosed to the public. With continued conservation
efforts, hopefully these trees will live for thousands of years more. [1]
B)
The 6th mass extinction (Anthropocene
extinction)
3. According
to Wikipedia, The Holocene extinction, otherwise referred to as the Sixth
extinction or Anthropocene extinction, is the ongoing extinction event of
species during the present Holocene epoch, mainly as a result of human activity…
‘Anthropocene’ is a term introduced in 2000. Some now postulate that a new
geological epoch has begun, with the most abrupt and widespread extinction of
species since the Cretaceous- Paleogene extinction event (concerning the
dinosaurs) 66 million years ago. [2]
4. It
is said that the (next to) last mass extinction (that of the dinosaurs) was
caused either by a meteorite or by volcanic eruptions, or by both of these
factors. However it is very likely that the dinosaurs had driven themselves to
extinction by eating away the planet. At the end of their era, dinosaurs became
so large and numerous that they probably exhausted the natural resources. If
this is true then it would have been a matter of time before a natural
catastrophe occurred (not even the greatest one), forcing the dinosaurs to
starve. This could also be why after the disappearance of the dinosaurs most of
the species which survived were small- sized.
C)
SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence)
5. The
SETI institute needs no special introduction, since it is famous for its
searches for aliens, as well as its failure to find any of them. Thus the
character of this organization has two aspects. On one hand, it is searching
the wrong way (advanced extraterrestrial civilizations are supposedly
sufficiently advanced so that they cannot be traced). On the other hand, they
don’t really care if they discover any alien at all, since they are only
interested in spending their leisure time without meaning (and advanced
civilizations would not care communicating with SETI either).
D)
The New Middle Ages
6. In
the past, environmental and humanitarian crises have been treated with new
growth. However, this time, there is no margin for such growth. There is no
space left for agricultural exploitation (and the few remaining rain forests
are now protected), while natural resources have been exhausted (oil is running
out, while we need a couple of centuries to fully harness nuclear fusion).
While it took us just 150 years (since the beginning of the Industrial
Revolution) to destroy the environment, it would take us much more to recover (both us and the environment).
7. This
is not a prediction but reality. This is an example:
How long does it take for a new species to form? Not
so fast- researchers find that lasting evolutionary change takes about one
million years. [3]
8. Thus,
even if we stopped destroying our planet right now, it would take thousands of
years for pristine forests with ancient trees to recover, and millions of years
for extinct species (in the form of new species) to appear. We have already
caused such a large damage to the environment that we will have to be patient
enough to wait not only for some thousand years for the recovery of forests with ancient trees,
but also for a couple of million years for new species to appear.
9. Apparently,
during the same timespan (given that we will still be here), we will have
evolved enough to have become a ‘green’ (ecological) civilization. But when and
if we reach such a stage, what would we think about our dark past? How would we
then treat other alien civilizations (that we will presumably have discovered),
doing to their planet what we used to do to our own planet in the past? Would
there be any point coming in contact with them? If not then this is the
explanation why no advanced civilization has ever bothered to contact us, or
let us know about their existence till now.
E)
Do we know more about the universe than about
our own planet?
10. This
is a related article:
Considering that we don’t know how big space is (or
even if there’s just one universe), we can say with reasonable certainty that
we probably know more about the ocean than we do about the cosmos.
But don’t click away yet, because that doesn’t really
get to the point at hand: Our knowledge of the ocean- when compared to our
knowledge of the space we know and can explore- is shockingly thin. Consider
that we’ve sent 12 people to the moon since 1969 over a handful of missions;
only three people have descended to the deepest part of the ocean in the
Marianas Trench. Even more shocking? The ocean takes up about 71 percent of
Earth’s space, yet a whopping 95 percent of that ocean is completely
unexplored. [4]
11. Why
don’t we know more about the oceans? This is an explanation:
It’s really a hard place to work. In many ways, it’s
easier to put a person into space than it is to send a person down to the
bottom of the ocean. For one thing, the pressure exerted by the water above is
enormous. It’s the equivalent of one person trying to support 50 jumbo jets.
It’s also dark and cold. Unlike space where you can see forever, once you’re
down in the ocean you can’t see anything because your light can’t shine very
far. It’s a challenging place to study. Satellites are great for giving us that
broad picture of the surface of the ocean. We can measure temperature. We can
measure ocean color. We can measure the winds, the waves and sea level. But
what we currently can’t do from space is look down into the depths of the
ocean. [5]
12. Is,
therefore, the search for UFOs and aliens a byproduct of our own ignorance and
imagination, a projection of our own xenophobia (fear of the unknown), or the
result of our own need to find some new gods we could lean on?
F)
Superorganisms
13. Perhaps
such advanced civilizations and societies (groups and colonies) have already
existed on our own planet for hundreds of millions of years. They are called
superorganisms. This is a description:
A superorganism is a group of synergistically interacting
organisms of the same species. The term superorganism is used most often to
describe a social unit of animals, where division of labor is highly
specialized, and where individuals are not able to survive by themselves for
extended periods. Ants (or bees) are examples of such a superorganism… The
concept of a superorganism raises the question of what is to be considered an
individual. Some scientists have suggested that individual human beings can be
thought of as ‘superorganisms.’ [6]
14. It
is certainly erroneous that some people (who consider themselves scientists) do
not realize that an individual human being is not a superorganism. A
superorganism can be a society (a group) of human beings who work together for
the common benefit. The notion of a superorganism has to include both
biological and sociological criteria. Bees and ants for example are not just ‘a
collection of microbes and genes referring to the same species,’ but individual
entities of the same species which also exhibit social behavior (the ‘spirit of
the hive’). Thus only an ignorant or egopath would consider himself a
superorganism. And this is the biggest everlasting problem of humanity: we have
been unable to learn how to live together as a species, and cooperate with
nature for the sake not only of ourselves but also of any other species.
G)
The ‘spirit of the hive’
15. This
is an example. A bee colony may consist of 50,000 individuals (including the
workers, the drones, and the queen.) Let’s call this number N. The average lifespan, which we may
call L, of a summer bee is about 30
days. Thus for a population of N=
50,000 bees, the queen needs to lay 50,000 eggs in 30 days (about 1600 per
day). Let’s call this rate R. Thus
for a given population we have,
N=RL
N=RL
16. What
matters in this equation is not how long an individual lives, but what the
reproduction rate (R) of the colony
is. In human terms, if we take a town of N=
50,000 people, and each person lives on average L= 80 years, then the town needs R= N/L= 625 newborn people per year to sustain its population. But the
town could also sustain the same population with a number of about 1,600 new
individuals per day, if the average lifespan of human beings was just 30 days
(as in the case of bees).
17. Someone
now might argue that 30 days are not enough for a human being to acquire the
necessary knowledge and dexterity which applies to an advanced and intelligent
species. However the same knowledge and intelligence can be stored within the
society (in analogy to the bee hive) instead of the mind of the individual
member. In that sense while each member of that society would be totally
dependent on its society in order to survive and learn new skills, the society
as a superorganism will include all the necessary information on a collective
level.
18. It
doesn’t really matter how much you live, as long as someone else takes your
place, in terms both of biology and behavior. But we humans are too stubborn
and self- oriented to realize and accept this truth. In few words, if the
average human lifespan right now is about 80 years, while human beings above
the age of 40 can be considered old, if we reduced the average lifespan to 40
years and doubled the reproduction rate, we would then have a much healthier
and more active society. But how many of us would have their lives terminated
at the age of 40 voluntarily? I didn’t…
H)
Saving planet Earth
19. At
this point of time where we have arrived as a species, the only thing which
truly matters is the protection and conservation of the environment. The
general attitude- that intervening in nature is necessary, is problematic and
probably wrong altogether. While planting a new tree or managing which and how
many trees we should cut is not a bad idea, trying to prevent major natural
disasters (such as comet impacts or volcanic explosions) is difficult if not
impossible. While our anthropic egoism does not let us realize that a species
can neither exist for ever nor conquer the whole universe, natural evolution
comes in cycles, which, no matter how long they may last, they finally end. How
well therefore are we prepared or have realized that cosmic truth, so that we
let ourselves live in harmony with nature, letting at the same time other
species evolve, so that some of these species may be our own successor in the
future?
20. And
by ‘successor’ I don’t mean computers and robots. Biological species are much
more powerful and successful than artificial ones. Think for example how a
robot could reproduce itself or heal its wounds and find food, while for living
(biological) creatures these processes are self- sustained and occur naturally.
If artificial intelligence were to prevail over natural intelligence, this
would have already happened during the 13.8 billion years of evolution in the universe (an advanced alien civilization would have already conquered the galaxy with some kind of
nanobots). This is why biological life and emotional intelligence are so
important and unsurpassable. This is also why wisdom is an inescapable result
of the evolution of intelligence, so that if a species reaches the stage of
wisdom before it self- destructs, it will finally come to terms with physical
reality (the circle of birth and death), and fully integrate itself with nature
as an advanced superorganism (like ants or bees have already done).
I)
And to mention some sayings:
“Any sufficiently
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Arthur Clark
“Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from nature.”
(?)
“If the bee disappeared off the face of the Earth, man would only have four years left to live.”
Albert Einstein?
21. Even if man finds an alternative procedure to pollination for producing food, a world without bees would be too colorless a place to live.
22. This is happening right now….
J) Who wants to live for a million years?...
[1]: [http://www.oldest.org/nature/trees/]
[2]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction]
[3]: [https://phys.org/news/2011-08-fast-evolutionary-million-years.html]
[4]: [https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/oceanography/deep-ocean-exploration.htm]
[5]: [https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/oceans-the-great-unknown-58.html]
[6]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superorganism]
9/19/2018
Image: [http://www.oldest.org/nature/trees/]
*The ages of the oldest trees refer
to individual trees. Otherwise the age of the oldest clonal colony of trees,
Pando, is estimated at 80,000, or even 1,000,000, years.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_trees#Clonal_trees]
In the latter case, the time it
will take for clonal colonies of trees to fully recover on the planet, is equal
to the estimated time it takes for a new species to appear- 1,000,000 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment