A) What is a scapegoat?
1. This is a saying of mine:
“A society gives birth to its own scapegoats, so that the same society can be retrospectively exempted from its own sins.”
2. This is a couple of definitions:
- In in
its religious sense, a scapegoat is an animal which is ritually burdened with
the sins of others then driven away. [1]
- In the
social-psychological sense, scapegoating is the practice of singling out a
person or group for unmerited blame and consequent negative treatment. A
scapegoat may be an adult, child, sibling, employee, peer, ethnic, political or
religious group, or country. [2]
3. Goggling ‘the most famous scapegoats in history,’
I came up with the following results:
- Sacco and Vanzetti
- Rudolf Hess
- Leon Trotsky
- Marie Antoinette
- Jews
- Catherine O’Leary’s Cow. [3]
4. The previous list is accompanied by the
following comment:
“History’s most famous
scapegoats prove that people never learn from their mistakes- For centuries,
scapegoating has been one of the most effective tools leaders have used to
unite people underneath a false banner in order to establish power. What better
way to keep people’s minds off the problems at hand than bringing up and
blaming an evil race of boogeymen from a distant land? It’s this kind of
finger-pointing that has sadly led to many unnecessary wars, assassinations,
and genocides.” [4]
B) The scapegoat must be the purest of us all
5. Here we should clarify a misunderstanding.
Scapegoats are not always evil persons (like Rudolf Hess for example). In fact
a scapegoat had better be a pure person so that he/she can be burdened with as
many responsibilities of others as possible. The sacrifice of Iphigenia is an
example that comes to mind. Jesus Christ is another example. He sacrificed
himself to release the human race from its sins. And as Iphigenia had been a
means by which supposedly the winds would blow (so that the Greek ships could
leave for Troy), so Jesus has become an instrument by which the religious
leaders of Christianity have united the crowds and have imposed their rule.-
6. It is certain that if Jesus returned to the
Earth, the first people who he would have condemned would be the same religious
leaders.
C) Socrates’s apology
7. But beyond the social, either religious or
political, aspect of a scapegoat, there is a deeper symbolical dimension. I
will use Socrates and his apology as a philosophical paradigm. The ancient
Greek society has been idealized as the prototype of a free, intellectual and
democratic society. But Plato’s apology shows otherwise. Socrates was accused,
among other things, for atheism (introducing ‘new demons’) and corruption of
the youth (teaching them to be revolutionary and sceptic). Thus the Greek
society at the time of Socrates had been mostly pious and conservative.
8. Another of Plato’s dialogues, Critias (Crito),
describes the last moments of Socrates, where Socrates explains why he accepts
the death penalty, and why he prefers to die:
“Then will they not
say (Socrates referring to Crito): “You, Socrates, are breaking the covenants
and agreements which you made with us at your leisure, not in any haste or
under any compulsion or deception, but having had seventy years to think of
them, during which time you were at liberty to leave the city, if we were not
to your mind, or if our covenants appeared to you to be unfair…
For just
consider, if you transgress and err in this sort of way, what good will you do,
either to yourself or to your friends? That your friends will be driven into
exile and deprived of citizenship, or will lose their property, is tolerably
certain; and you yourself, if you fly to one of the neighboring cities,… which
are well-governed cities, will come to them as an enemy, Socrates, and their
government will be against you, and all patriotic citizens will cast an evil
eye upon you as a subverter of the laws, and you will confirm in the minds of
the judges the justice of their own condemnation of you. For he who is a
corrupter of the laws is more than likely to be corrupter of the young and
foolish portion of mankind. Will you then flee from well-ordered cities and
virtuous men? And is existence worth having on these terms?...
Listen, then,
Socrates, to us who have brought you up. Think not of life and children first,
and of justice afterwards, but of justice first, that you may be justified
before the princes of the world below. For neither will you nor any that belong
to you be happier or holier or juster in this life, or happier in another, if
you do as Crito bids. Now you depart in innocence, a sufferer and not a doer of
evil; a victim, not of the laws, but of men. But if you go forth, returning
evil for evil, and injury for injury, breaking the covenants and agreements
which you have made with us, and wronging those whom you ought least to wrong,
that is to say, yourself, your friends, your country, and us, we shall be angry
with you while you live, and our brethren, the laws in the world below, will
receive you as an enemy; for they will know that you have done your best to
destroy us. Listen, then, to us and not to Crito.
This is the
voice which I seem to hear murmuring in my ears, like the sound of the flute in
the ears of the mystic; that voice, I say, is humming in my ears, and prevents
me from hearing any other. And I know that anything more which you will say
will be in vain….” [5]
D) The scapegoat is an archetypal figure
9. It is true that Socrates refused to escape,
although his guards had been bribed to let him go. If Socrates had escaped then
he would not be a prototype of heroism and morality nowadays. Socrates
chose to sacrifice himself for the benefit of others, preferring an honorable
death instead of keeping on living the pointless life of a runaway.
10. Someone might argue that Socrates decision was
selfish- an aspect which he had already shown in court. If he had apologized to
his prosecutors, in all likelihood he would have been excused, at least having
avoided the death penalty. But could we say that, like Socrates, Jesus should
have begged for his life in order not to have been crucified? Should we give
ourselves up to anyone else, betraying our own beliefs and ideas, living
consequently the rest of our lives humiliated and deprived of our pride?
11. After Socrates drunk the conium, it is said that
his accusers regretted having him killed. But such regret always comes
retrospectively. The function of this feeling of remorse is to make us think if
what we did was right or false. In the process of thinking we become more moral
persons, and this way we gradually transform our society into a more tolerant
and open- minded unity.
12. However we will always need a scapegoat to point
at, focusing thus all our attention on a certain problem, thus also on the
nucleus of beliefs and ideas which hold our society together. If it weren’t for
that core, which gathers the basic principles of our identity as a social and
political species, our whole society would fall apart. Therefore we may say
that the existence of an ‘escape goat’ is an ‘inescapable’ archetype which
unites us all.
E) The scapegoat as an invisible enemy
13. Throughout history, the scapegoat- the one whom
we may all cast a stone at- has served as a unifying factor for society. It is
‘us’ against ‘them,’ as another political, religious, ethnic, or racial group.
Recently terrorism (in the form of the Islamic or Communist ‘threat’) has been
used as the scapegoat, justifying the cause and the means of modern superpowers
to invade and occupy other nations. If it weren’t for Islam or Communism,
another religion or political view would be targeted, so that the same
superpowers and people would still satisfy their greed and their own phobias.
14. Because, ultimately, and beyond our wildest
ambitions, isn’t it our ‘common enemy’ a ghost which we are all afraid of, an
invisible scapegoat which keeps us united?
F) Well, any volunteers?…
15. Who will cast the first stone?
[1]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoat]
[2]: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating]
[3]: [https://www.google.gr/search?q=most+famous+scapegoats+in+history]
[4]: [http://www.viralnova.com/scapegoats/]
[5]: [http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html]
9/18/2018
Image: [http://www.pravmir.com/scapegoating/]
No comments:
Post a Comment